Table Of Content
- Understanding Native and Hybrid Mobile Applications
- Native Apps vs Hybrid Apps: A One-View Comparison
With businesses rapidly going online, a trend of launching mobile apps is on the move. Honestly, it’s beyond just being a competitive trend; it’s an essential part of networking, marketing, and sales. Especially in the eCommerce landscape, mobile applications have proven to be the key factor of success.
Despite knowing the cruciality of mobile applications, businesses get stuck on one question: whether a native app or a hybrid one. The answer to this question lies in understanding what these two types stand for and how they are different from each other.
This is why we have explained native apps vs hybrid apps in detail in this blog along with a full-comparison chart to help you make an informed decision.
We can understand the value of these two types by understanding native apps vs hybrid apps individually.
Native apps are native to the operating system or device they are specifically designed for. These apps are mobile-specific platforms. It means they work only on operating systems of mobile phones such as iOS and Android.
To exemplify, most apps that you download and install via pp Store are native mobile applications. Either they do not have their desktop-specific versions or these apps have entirely separate applications designed for Windows or macOS. For example, developers use Swift for iOS apps and Java for Android apps.
The best part of a native app is that it offers better functionalities. For example, camera and GPS functionalities. Since these apps do not rely on any browser for access, they perform individually. This leads to better speed, rendering, and performance.
A downside of a native app is that its testing can be difficult if you have multiple codebases for multiple devices.
So, if you want high-end, dedicated apps with premium features and performance, and the budget is not an issue, go for native mobile applications.
In a question of native apps vs hybrid apps, the latter takes its place as the lower-maintained.
These are originally built using web technologies and then embedded in a native container to be accessed on mobile phones. In simpler words, hybrid mobile applications are those that you can access via a browser on any mobile device.
Talking about web technologies, developers mostly use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to develop these apps.
One of the best features of these apps is they are easy to build on a single framework for different operating systems. This also means they are easy to maintain via just one codebase.
On the downside, accessing features such as a camera is difficult on hybrid apps. Besides, these applications rely on browsers. It means the speed of the app depends on how fast your browser’s loading is.
So, if you want a pocket-friendly, low-maintenance app with decent features, you can go for hybrid mobile applications.
For eCommerce businesses, having any of these two types of apps is imperative. If you want to create one for your eCommerce business, here’s our Guide To eCommerce App Development: Steps, Key Features, Trends.
Aspect | Native Apps | Hybrid Apps |
Development Languages | Swift, Objective-C (iOS), Kotlin, Java (Android) | HTML, CSS, JavaScript |
Performance | The performance is high | Moderate to low |
User Experience | Excellent, platform-specific | Good, but it is not as consistent as native apps |
Access to Device Features | Full access | Limited access, dependent on the plugins it uses |
Development Cost | Higher (due to separate codebases) | Lower (single codebase) |
Maintenance | It requires maintaining multiple codebases | It is easier with a single codebase |
Time to Market | Longer (due to separate development) | Shorter (single development cycle) |
Distribution | Platform-specific app stores | Platform-specific app stores |
Offline Capability | Excellent offline performance | Good, but it relies on the framework used |
Updates | It requires updating each platform individually | It requires single update for all platforms |
First, it comes to how much time you can spend on the app development process. Every project has a set deadline which heavily decides the type of technology to use. The same is the case with your native apps vs hybrid apps question. If you have tight deadlines and your app requirements are medium to decent, a hybrid app will work for you.
In case, you want a powerful, fully-featured app for specific operating systems and you can manage to wait longer, you must choose a native app.
As we’re talking about mobile phones, device functions have a role to play. Device functions such as cameras and GPS are quite useful these days for many types of businesses. However, it all depends on what your business requires.
If your project does not need any device functions on the app, then a hybrid app will be a good choice in a better budget option. However, choose a native app if your app needs these and more device functions.
Just like project duration, low and high budgets also decide when the question arises: native apps vs hybrid apps. When on a tight budget, go for the single-coding-backed, low-maintenance hybrid app. On the other hand, if your expenditure meter is on the higher side, you can choose a native app if you want.
Learning about these two helps businesses decide whether native mobile applications or hybrid mobile applications work for them. To conclude, it depends majorly on what your project’s goals are and what you are aiming at with your mobile app.
2023-24 eCommDaddy, All rights reserved.